I have sometimes been upbraided on this list for expressing my disapproval of those who "hardtail" bikes that formerly had rear suspension and make other Teutelisations to stock machines in order to create "works of art"
It has been said "A motorcycle is a work of art that is best seen while in motion."
Thus, the best art is the art that moves the best.
It follows that modifications to a stock motorcycle that reduce it's rideability also reduce it's aesthetic appeal.
Similarly, scratch-building a motorcycle that rides poorly is also bad art.
A prime example of good motorcycle art?
Anything built by John Britten, who didn't give a sh1t what his bikes looked like so long as they performed.
A prime example of bad motorcycle art?
Any of the creations one sees on TV chopper-building shows, where the builders don't give a sh1t about how they perform as long as they look "artistic".
It has been said "A motorcycle is a work of art that is best seen while in motion."
Thus, the best art is the art that moves the best.
It follows that modifications to a stock motorcycle that reduce it's rideability also reduce it's aesthetic appeal.
Similarly, scratch-building a motorcycle that rides poorly is also bad art.
A prime example of good motorcycle art?
Anything built by John Britten, who didn't give a sh1t what his bikes looked like so long as they performed.
A prime example of bad motorcycle art?
Any of the creations one sees on TV chopper-building shows, where the builders don't give a sh1t about how they perform as long as they look "artistic".
Comment