Mike, this guy, Robert seems to be a tech also (and I believe you are also a tech from past conversations). I was one for 45 years (retired) with an associates degree in electronics and microprocessor technology (and also worked in my Dad's lawnmower business since I was 8 working on power equipment and motorcycles). His thoughts (and yours) on the two volts per cell is correct and I had missed that because the sensor is on the third cell as shown in my photo . His thoughts on the sensor only measuring the electrolyte level is also correct. However, there is a leg on the microprocessor that is held low to give the alarm in the "normal" state. It is the voltage from the electrolyte that holds that leg in a "high" state which removes the alarm. The voltage to lift the state is +6VDC but there is a safe range and I have proved on several motorcycles that it can handle 12VDC without damage.
With that said, I am going to agree that you are correct that a small value resistor will act as a simple "shock absorber" and ensure the voltage to hold that leg "up" is low enough to not cause damage. It makes good sense and is extra insurance.

With that said, I am going to agree that you are correct that a small value resistor will act as a simple "shock absorber" and ensure the voltage to hold that leg "up" is low enough to not cause damage. It makes good sense and is extra insurance.
Comment