Uhhh....
Aren't case bolts 9 ft-lb for the 6 mm and 14 ft-lb for the 8 mm?
While I agree that channel locks are not an acceptable form of tightening a critical fastener such as an axle bolt, the torque can't be that critical in this instance. Anyone who has tightened castle nuts with a torque wrench knows that your chances of winning the lottery at the same instant as getting struck by lightening are greater than getting proper torque with the slots lined up to get that cotter pin to slide through. So, do you go to 60 ft-lbs or to 45? In the case of the axle with a fine pitch thread, the actual pressure on the bolt exerted with each foot pound of torque is nominal, so I'd just go to the one closest to being lined up.
BTW, when doing work on other's bikes, try to avoid "gootentight" whether you charge or not, cause it won't stand up as well as a tinkerer's dam to Noah's flood in front of a Judge in a liability hearing. JAT
Aren't case bolts 9 ft-lb for the 6 mm and 14 ft-lb for the 8 mm?
While I agree that channel locks are not an acceptable form of tightening a critical fastener such as an axle bolt, the torque can't be that critical in this instance. Anyone who has tightened castle nuts with a torque wrench knows that your chances of winning the lottery at the same instant as getting struck by lightening are greater than getting proper torque with the slots lined up to get that cotter pin to slide through. So, do you go to 60 ft-lbs or to 45? In the case of the axle with a fine pitch thread, the actual pressure on the bolt exerted with each foot pound of torque is nominal, so I'd just go to the one closest to being lined up.
BTW, when doing work on other's bikes, try to avoid "gootentight" whether you charge or not, cause it won't stand up as well as a tinkerer's dam to Noah's flood in front of a Judge in a liability hearing. JAT
Comment