Funny part is, with a 'normal' rear end gear and an OD tranny, I estimate I should get around 20mpg, at least.
The 454, over the last 40years, is just about the least efficient engine chevy made. Not because it had to be, but because GM decided that, while we like the big cubes, we don't really need the power.
The design engineer that designed the small block, for GM, in 1954 stated that " All internal combustion gasoline engines should produce 1hp/cuin."
My 502 produces 502hp. It is NOT a racing motor. It has a very mild cam.
For all you 454ers, there is no reason that your engines can't produce 450hp, allowing you to regear and get FAR better fuel mileage than you currently get.
One guy, in Edmonton, Alberta, had a 454 powered Firebird, dynoed at 423hp, and routinely got 28mpg highway...
The 454, over the last 40years, is just about the least efficient engine chevy made. Not because it had to be, but because GM decided that, while we like the big cubes, we don't really need the power.
The design engineer that designed the small block, for GM, in 1954 stated that " All internal combustion gasoline engines should produce 1hp/cuin."
My 502 produces 502hp. It is NOT a racing motor. It has a very mild cam.
For all you 454ers, there is no reason that your engines can't produce 450hp, allowing you to regear and get FAR better fuel mileage than you currently get.
One guy, in Edmonton, Alberta, had a 454 powered Firebird, dynoed at 423hp, and routinely got 28mpg highway...
Comment