Originally posted by CaptonZap
View Post
Steel is three times more dense than aluminum. If the steel cover is lighter it is because it contains at least three times less material than the aluminum cover. Such a thin piece of steel would have a higher temperature gradient between the two sides, increasing the rate of thermal conductivity, or as you stated, have "fewer molecules for the excitation to travel through with the steel." It would also store less heat than the aluminum due to steel's lower specific heat. Hence the steel cover would be fully capable of compensating for its disadvantageous thermal conductivity by being made of less material.
This goes back to the point I was trying to make, which is that more mass does not create a better heat sink.
Choice of material, mass, and surface area are three areas of consideration when dealing with heat transfer. Weighing all the variables, it would seem necessary to conduct an experiment or gather a general consensus from those who have used both oil filter systems to come to a meaningful conclusion regarding heat transfer properties of each one.
My hunch is that the stock system is better at dissipating heat, but that the difference is negligible. A thin aluminum housing with cooling fins and a lot of surface area seems like a perfectly legitimate oil filter system.
Comment