I would like to check myself here before I do something entirely avoidable in retrospect data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70056/70056d04ac93346c6e5880190f83748779051495" alt="Embarrassment"
I just got done playing with my feelers and ---
(For Ref: My gauges are the standard&metric that for mm go: .1, .13, .15, .18, .2 Also the bike is a 1980 LG aka MNS so I-speck= .11 to .15 & E-speck=.21 to .24)
I1: .1 no contact, .13light contact, .15 overshoot
I2: .8 no contact, .1 very light contact, .13 overshoot
I3: .13 no contact, .15 extreamly light contact, .18 overshoot
I4: .8 no contact, .1 very light contact, .13 overshoot
E1: .15 no contact, .18 contact
E2: .15 no contact, .18 extreamly light contact, .2 overshoot
E3 .13 no contact, .15 my imagination? , .18 medium contact
E4 .13 no contact, .15 my imagination?, .18 overshoot
So I figure I=.13 and E=.23 are ideals to shoot for (tighter better for perf that I probly would not feel, best to keep it in center of spec range otherwise is assumtion)
now these shims come in .005mm which would not register on my scale: should I try playing between the cracks to estimate as close as possible or would at or around these following numbers be just fine as long as I get it in the median:
I1: 0 adjustment
I2: .03 smaller then existing shim
I3: .02 larger then existing shim
I4: .03 smaller then existing shim
E 1,2,3,&4: .05 smaller then existing shim across the board.
The next step is to find out my existing shim sizes but the tool I don't have is not reported to work that well. That leaves pulling the cams.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4fc5/a4fc529a6eef2ac3b62ec2e3e69b8d064d0115cd" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
First question: my dots and arrows line up spot on, but on the "F". The book says this should happen on the "T". Whats up with that? It seems to me that chain ware would make the dots wander apart rather then in the same direction, and if my box c miles are anywhere near right I have only around 12K mi on this thing - not in chain replacement mileage range. Possible mix up at sometime? my chain does seem to have a master link which I have read is not stock? or would this possibly be a case of set right with poor marking accuracy from the factory? confusing.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48890/48890c87fa16db855fc1ef986b334f1f80567d08" alt="Confused"
Second question: In the books process of removal it states (with the motor at TDC) to remove the reachable cam sprocket bolts (1 each) then rotate the engine 180 with out moving the cams to get at the other bolts. I think I am missing something basic here, but I don't understand how that would be possible. if we leave the chain in place to move the sprockets when we move the motor 180 and the sprocket is still attached to the cams due to the bolts we wish to remove, then would this not move the cams? like I said I am failing to understand something. I would normally just take it apart to better understand it, but in this case learning by discovery may not be smart
. This is the greater good all those gagets died to teach me as a little kid: If you plan on reassembly - take it apart right!
If you are still with me, I thank you!
what are your thoughts?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70056/70056d04ac93346c6e5880190f83748779051495" alt="Embarrassment"
I just got done playing with my feelers and ---
(For Ref: My gauges are the standard&metric that for mm go: .1, .13, .15, .18, .2 Also the bike is a 1980 LG aka MNS so I-speck= .11 to .15 & E-speck=.21 to .24)
I1: .1 no contact, .13light contact, .15 overshoot
I2: .8 no contact, .1 very light contact, .13 overshoot
I3: .13 no contact, .15 extreamly light contact, .18 overshoot
I4: .8 no contact, .1 very light contact, .13 overshoot
E1: .15 no contact, .18 contact
E2: .15 no contact, .18 extreamly light contact, .2 overshoot
E3 .13 no contact, .15 my imagination? , .18 medium contact
E4 .13 no contact, .15 my imagination?, .18 overshoot
So I figure I=.13 and E=.23 are ideals to shoot for (tighter better for perf that I probly would not feel, best to keep it in center of spec range otherwise is assumtion)
now these shims come in .005mm which would not register on my scale: should I try playing between the cracks to estimate as close as possible or would at or around these following numbers be just fine as long as I get it in the median:
I1: 0 adjustment
I2: .03 smaller then existing shim
I3: .02 larger then existing shim
I4: .03 smaller then existing shim
E 1,2,3,&4: .05 smaller then existing shim across the board.
The next step is to find out my existing shim sizes but the tool I don't have is not reported to work that well. That leaves pulling the cams.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a4fc5/a4fc529a6eef2ac3b62ec2e3e69b8d064d0115cd" alt="Roll Eyes (Sarcastic)"
First question: my dots and arrows line up spot on, but on the "F". The book says this should happen on the "T". Whats up with that? It seems to me that chain ware would make the dots wander apart rather then in the same direction, and if my box c miles are anywhere near right I have only around 12K mi on this thing - not in chain replacement mileage range. Possible mix up at sometime? my chain does seem to have a master link which I have read is not stock? or would this possibly be a case of set right with poor marking accuracy from the factory? confusing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48890/48890c87fa16db855fc1ef986b334f1f80567d08" alt="Confused"
Second question: In the books process of removal it states (with the motor at TDC) to remove the reachable cam sprocket bolts (1 each) then rotate the engine 180 with out moving the cams to get at the other bolts. I think I am missing something basic here, but I don't understand how that would be possible. if we leave the chain in place to move the sprockets when we move the motor 180 and the sprocket is still attached to the cams due to the bolts we wish to remove, then would this not move the cams? like I said I am failing to understand something. I would normally just take it apart to better understand it, but in this case learning by discovery may not be smart
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dda66/dda6694dab28a43452af0012a0f1e45b25a2c11a" alt="Wink"
If you are still with me, I thank you!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4de5/c4de5d4a50ce82a01e25b2eb4b68560a3150af9e" alt="Big Grin"
what are your thoughts?
Comment