Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Springer front end or inverted forks from harley davidson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Simon Cowell? Really?
    Joe


    78XS1100

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by joceiphus View Post
      Simon Cowell? Really?
      Yeah, really.
      Ich habe dich nicht gefragt.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by ivan View Post
        yeah, really.
        Joe


        78XS1100

        Comment


        • #19
          On that note, don't forget Fran Drescher. The one person on earth I wish to punch in the throat mid-laugh.
          BARE BONES CHOPPERS: If it don't make it go faster, you don't need it!
          80 XS1100SG(cafe in progress *slowly)

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by concours View Post
            The bike pictured has a GIRDER front end on it. Springer operates entirely different. Both are a giant step backward in motorcycle engineering.
            Hi Concours,
            IMHO teles are the backward step.
            Both pantograph-action(girder) and short leading link (springer) forks are inherently more rigid than tele-forks.
            It's that the girders and springers one normally sees are strictly 1930s designs while the tele-fork has seen continuous development since then.
            For modern girders see the Vincent aluminum forging girdraulics or more modern yet, the carbon fiber girders on a Britten race bike.
            And didn't Harley offer a modern hydraulic damped springer fork as an option on certain models?
            But getting back to Andrew's need for "distinctive" suspension, how about a modernized version of the Indian 1/4-elliptic leaf spring trailing link fork?
            Restore the swingarm motion with another 1/4-elliptic too, eh?
            Now that'd look really trick.
            Fred Hill, S'toon
            XS11SG with Spirit of America sidecar
            "The Flying Pumpkin"

            Comment


            • #21
              I really like the Indian leaf spring front end.
              Joe


              78XS1100

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by fredintoon View Post
                Hi Concours,
                IMHO teles are the backward step.
                Both pantograph-action(girder) and short leading link (springer) forks are inherently more rigid than tele-forks.
                It's that the girders and springers one normally sees are strictly 1930s designs while the tele-fork has seen continuous development since then.
                For modern girders see the Vincent aluminum forging girdraulics or more modern yet, the carbon fiber girders on a Britten race bike.
                And didn't Harley offer a modern hydraulic damped springer fork as an option on certain models?
                But getting back to Andrew's need for "distinctive" suspension, how about a modernized version of the Indian 1/4-elliptic leaf spring trailing link fork?
                Restore the swingarm motion with another 1/4-elliptic too, eh?
                Now that'd look really trick.
                Yeeeeaaaahhhhhhh... My 1974 FXEF was a real canyon carver, that Fury girder was great stuff.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Springer and Turbo.

                  You may want to take a look at this site for some ideas. http://www.tcbroschoppers.com/store/. They are geared to 650 Yamahas but I think several of the products could be used on our XS1100's. As far as the Turbo goes. Google the "Mr. Turbo Website". They used to sell a kit for the XS a long time ago, but now I think you would have to go with one of there Universal Kits.
                  Tom

                  Comment

                  Working...
                  X