thought i would start a new thread after being inspired from some off-topic discussion in another thread.
ratbyk posted something about a 1957 morris minor getting over 50 mpg.
while this is rather impressive, it is also a bit disturbing to me. I read an article the other day about these new hybrid cars. they say the actual economy is only about 60% of the manufacturer's claims. (claim-55, actual-33).
have we not progressed technologically over the past 50 years? i realize the engine in this morris minor car is probalby smaller than on our motorcycles, but still....
I would love to own something that could get over 50 mpg.
my car is a 97 cutlass. it has a 3.1 liter V6 - the best I have ever gotten with that car is 26 - and that was under ideal conditions.
normally: town = 18mpg, hwy = 21mpg
I'm curious what some of you have gotten for fuel economy in various vehicles you've owned - motorcycle or car. especially those of you who have seen 50+ MPG or metric equivalent.
ratbyk posted something about a 1957 morris minor getting over 50 mpg.
while this is rather impressive, it is also a bit disturbing to me. I read an article the other day about these new hybrid cars. they say the actual economy is only about 60% of the manufacturer's claims. (claim-55, actual-33).
have we not progressed technologically over the past 50 years? i realize the engine in this morris minor car is probalby smaller than on our motorcycles, but still....
I would love to own something that could get over 50 mpg.
my car is a 97 cutlass. it has a 3.1 liter V6 - the best I have ever gotten with that car is 26 - and that was under ideal conditions.
normally: town = 18mpg, hwy = 21mpg
I'm curious what some of you have gotten for fuel economy in various vehicles you've owned - motorcycle or car. especially those of you who have seen 50+ MPG or metric equivalent.
Comment