Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Clunk, clunk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by soccer4m View Post
    Hi, I started a rim thread a couple years back when I bought a xs1100 midnite and it had the 18 inch rim on it and wondered what it was and why the former owner did it. For those interested, go through the old threads,,,,anyway, it had a Bridgestone Spitfire s11 on it,,,,130'90-18 and it was great for dropping the revs down. It did sit one inch higher but I never noticed the diff.with my fat axx sinking the shocks.
    bridgestone spitfire 18 "tire circumference.= 86 inches versus
    dunlop d401 16" tire circumference. = 79.7 inches for the reg. rim...around 9.3% drop in revs. throughout the riding range.
    ...
    Very interesting... has anyone compared the 17" tire off the older standards vs. the 18" from the 750/850? I wonder how much of a difference it would make?
    '79 XS11 F
    Stock except K&N

    '79 XS11 SF
    Stock, no title.

    '84 Chevy K-10 "Big Blue"
    GM 350, Muncie SM465, NP208, GM 10 Bolt with 3.42gears turnin 31x10.5 Baja Claws

    "What they do have is an implacable, unrelenting presence and movement that bespeaks massive power lurking behind paint and chrome. They don't wail like a screeching ninja, the don't rumble like a harley. They just growl like a spactic, stressed out badger waiting to rip your face off and eat your soul." Trainzz~RIP~

    Comment


    • #17
      Main problem with this swap is tire size availability is even worse than the existing 17" wheel...

      Doing a search by the needed 130/90-18 size at MotorcycleSuperstore resulted in only four tires coming up; one each from Shinko, Bridgestone, Kenda, and IRC. I got no results at Jake Wilson. This will give you about a 1" gain in diameter, or about 4% more circumference; not very much.

      Dropping down an aspect ratio size to a 130/80-18 will get you seven tires, but the change in aspect ratio means the tire is now the same diameter as the OEM replacement size 130/90-17, so there's no gain there. Same thing goes for using a 120/90-18; you get a lot more choices in tires, but no gain in diameter.

      Even worse, these 'off' sizes don't have the specified load-carrying capability. The 'larger' 130/80-18 comes in at 660 lbs, or 10 lbs under the factory minimum of 670 (current 'stock' replacements are all at 690+). The 120 is even lower; only 640 lbs.
      Fast, Cheap, Reliable... Pick any two

      '78E original owner - resto project
      '78E ???? owner - Modder project FJ forks, 4-piston calipers F/R, 160/80-16 rear tire
      '82 XJ rebuild project
      '80SG restified, red SOLD
      '79F parts...
      '81H more parts...

      Other current bikes:
      '93 XL1200 Anniversary Sportster 85RWHP
      '86 XL883/1200 Chopper
      '82 XL1000 w/1450cc Buell, Baker 6-speed, in-progress project
      Cage: '13 Mustang GT/CS with a few 'custom' touches
      Yep, can't leave nuthin' alone...

      Comment


      • #18
        Thanks, Steve. I was wondering about this but didn't have time to check the tire choices.
        Try your hardest to be the kind of person your dog thinks you are.

        You can live to be 100, as long as you give up everything that would make you want to live to be 100!

        Current bikes:
        '06 Suzuki DR650
        *'82 XJ1100 with the 1179 kit. "Mad Maxim"
        '82 XJ1100 Completely stock fixer-upper
        '82 XJ1100 Bagger fixer-upper
        '82 XJ1100 Motor/frame and lots of boxes of parts
        '82 XJ1100 Parts bike
        '81 XS1100 Special
        '81 YZ250
        '80 XS850 Special
        '80 XR100
        *Crashed/Totalled, still own

        Comment

        Working...
        X