If the choice is gas vs. electric, go with the gas. Residential electric on-demand heaters just can't produce enough heat.To get the capacity of Ken's heater with electricity you would need about 60,000 watts. That would require a 250 amp service at 230v all by itself. Be careful not to confuse efficiency with economy. It's possible to have an electric heater with 99% efficiency. while most tankless/on-demand gas heaters are in the high 80% range. Gas of any type is still a good deal cheaper than electricity, so the gas heater will eventually save you money. The only efficiency increase of an on-demand electric vs. traditional electric heater is the tank loss. If you insulate the hell out of a tank then any "advantage" of an electric on demand is moot. If you have hydronic heat, check out an indirect water heater. It's an insulated tank with a heat exchanger coil inside that runs as a zone off of the boiler. I installed an Amtrol WHS-80 back in March. Continuous output, 70 degree rise, is about 3 gal/minute, but I'm starting with 80 gallons in the tank. We've run the dishwasher and washing machine and four consecutive showers without a problem because of the tank reserve. It's all stainless, inside a plastic shell that's filled with expanded foam. I'll lose 4 degrees over 24 hours if the boiler cuts out. My boiler is 95% efficient, so I'm probably getting 90-92% after the tank loss. Many apartment buildings run indirect fired heaters w/ boilers even if they have forced air heat. Like Ken's setup, it wasn't cheap either. I paid about $2500 all told, and I installed it myself. It has a 10 year warranty (what's there to break?
with an effective lifespan of 20-30 years. I would have gone with an on demand heater if I didn't already have a boiler though, FWIW. Sorry for droning on and on...

Comment