I don't think you're busting my chops at all. I appreciate the advice and knowledge. This bike was apparently quite the frankenstein before I got it, so I had no way of knowing that.
It was a one owner, and perhaps he did things without thinking. That is exactly opposite of what I intend to do. If its wrong or unsafe, I'm not going to keep it that way. I don't want to kill myself or anyone else if something is not correct.
As for the tank slapper syndrome, nothing yet, but I'm very familiar with death wobble on linked suspensions, so there is no way I'm gonna mess with it on a bike.
The brakes seem to stop ok, but then again, I don't drive the bike fast either. It was really just to putz around. But, I'll see about getting bigger brakes (safety is always a good excuse to modify)
I will build a fork brace for it if I can't find anything. Welding/building isn't a problem, just needed to know what to do!
Any suggestions on where/what to get bigger brakes from? What would I need for the swap?
80 Bobber
Collapse
X
-
-
To fully explain rake/trail geometry and the reasoning behind it would be a full book chapter, so here's the short version...
Each manufacturer decides what suspension geometry to have on a given bike. Factors taken into consideration are spring rates, shock damping, center of gravity, and overall bike weight among others. They're looking for the 'best balance' in handling, ease of riding, and safety; there's always tradeoffs involved. The 'type' of bike it is makes a difference too. But generally speaking, you'll see trail numbers of between 4" and 6" as the norm, with numbers under 5" usually being confined to sportbikes with their lighter weight and better suspensions. Larger, heavier bikes will run numbers in the 5 to 6 range. There are exceptions to this (you'll see pro-built choppers with lower trail numbers, but these have frames that are stretched in the downtubes/backbone), but these are general rules.
The effects of trail are these; less trail will give lighter steering effort, faster steering, but the bike will be prone to 'head shake' (violent oscillation of the bars back-and-forth) if 'upset', also known as a 'tank slapper'. The really bad part of this is the bike probably won't give any warning before it happens. The bike will also be less stable 'at speed' (needing more attention to keep it going straight). Many sportbikes with low trail numbers are fitted with steering dampers to help with this.
Too much trail has the opposite effect; heavy, slow steering, and the bike wants to go straight, resisting fast manuevering. No chance of a tank slapper.
As an anology, the effects are somewhat similar to oversteering/understeering in a car; the best 'balance' is neutral steering, but if you miss that, understeering (too much trail) is more easily controlled.
What makes this particularly bad on a XS is with the stock suspension geometry, they're prone to head shake already if you push the bike. Fork braces can help with this, but with your non-stock combo you may not be able to find anything to fit. You've got two strikes against you; you've reduced the trail with the fork/tree combo, plus by hardtailing the bike you've put added stress on the front suspension. Not at all good. The easy fix? Swap the 'standard' triple trees you have for 'Special' trees, you'll at least remove one strike. I'll also point out that those smaller-than-stock front brakes are another bad thing; the OEM brakes are only 'adequate' for a bike of this power/speed capabilities, you may find you have way more 'go' than 'whoa' with those smaller brakes.
I'm not trying to bust your chops, but if you end up as a greasy smear it won't be because you weren't warned....
For a rake/trail calculator which might help explain it better, look here: http://www.rbracing-rsr.com/rakeandtrail.html
As to 'what' bike you have, check your frame number against this: http://www.xs11.com/faqs/153-serial-...ry-colors.html. The frame controls pretty much what you can swap around.Last edited by crazy steve; 08-22-2011, 09:26 PM.Leave a comment:
-
Yah, I am quite familiar with caster. We extended the frontend of my Dodge and had to align the caster to keep it from hopping around. I've worked specifically on suspension on cars & trucks for many years.Do you understand alignment angles on a car? The "trail" on a motorcycle is the equivelent of the caster on a car.
It affects the ability and nimbleness of the steering. Bot he standard and the special have approximately the same "caster" in the front wheel but the wheel is mounted in a different location on thier respective fork configurations.
The difference is made up in the the angle the steering head is mounted on the respective frames.
If you put special forks on a standard frame it makes the caster more positive and will make the bike want to hold a straight line more readily but will make the steering more heavy to the touch and harder to corner quickly.
Vise versa with putting the standard forks on a special. It will make it too EASY to turn and "twichy". Unstable.
Granted, I've not been on a stock XS, but it feels pretty nimble moving around. Pretty easy to maneuver. My brother is an engineer, we'll throw together some measurements and angles for ya'll.
Also, as it appears I have a frankensten (so the name Frank is perfect...
) , how do I decipher if it is truly a special or a standard?
Last edited by ShootersHoliday; 08-22-2011, 09:17 PM.Leave a comment:
-
Do you understand alignment angles on a car? The "trail" on a motorcycle is the equivelent of the caster on a car.
It affects the ability and nimbleness of the steering. Bot he standard and the special have approximately the same "caster" in the front wheel but the wheel is mounted in a different location on thier respective fork configurations.
The difference is made up in the the angle the steering head is mounted on the respective frames.
If you put special forks on a standard frame it makes the caster more positive and will make the bike want to hold a straight line more readily but will make the steering more heavy to the touch and harder to corner quickly.
Vise versa with putting the standard forks on a special. It will make it too EASY to turn and "twichy". Unstable.Leave a comment:
-
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazy steve
By the way, that fork/tree combo isn't safe, as it reduces your trail and makes the handling twitchy. Works fine if you're running a sidehack, but otherwise, not so good...
explain please... I figured I'd rile up the purists, but I value the wisdom from this site. So, if something that was done/is being done is unsafe, i won't keep with that method.
I admit I have no idea what you all are talking about when you mention the "trail" of the combo. I know vehicle suspension, but this is my first dive into motorcycles.
Also, this "bobber" isn't permanently like this either. I built the hardtail so that I could swap back if I ever have the need/desire.Leave a comment:
-
explain please... I figured I'd rile up the purists, but I value the wisdom from this site. So, if something that was done/is being done is unsafe, i won't keep with that method.
Keep in mind I"m in it for a great running bike, and after all of the modifications I believe I have about $700 total invested.Leave a comment:
-
I'm ok with you guys thinking its ugly. But I'm wondering what your thoughts are on why its unsafe. I've ridden it pretty hard so far and she handles well.Notice that I specified without either a fender or fork brace, that the combo of the reduced trail (I've read fredintoon's description of the swap to standard trees with special forks enough to remember which way the hack guys go) AND no bracing of the forks as being dangerous. And the primary problem to me is the lack of any bracing. So, I spoke specifically of the COMBO of the two, and feel, fix either one and you only have a bit of a twitchy bike, rather than potential hazard, but I have PERSONALLY had the forks on mine start with the twisting because of things not being just right, and it gets scary, I could imagine it with less trail AND nothing to brace the two fork tubes together.
My knowledge from the PO (and as I've said, I've been fighting gremlins since the beginning) was that it was original. I didn't care if it was or not, but there you have it.
I still have the front fender. Would you all then recommend I either put it back on or build a brace? I'll measure the forks to find the diameter as well.
It was a hack job for sure. The tank said 79 on the bottom, the seat 76 I believe. The side covers seemed to fit ok, but not sure if they were stock. They were the same color as the seats plastic. Possibly same bike.Leave a comment:
-
Dave you got em riled now...
It is looking closer to what you envisioned in the mockup...its all yours now...
Now to swap the standard tank for a special...
Hope its running well for you.
JohnLeave a comment:
-
From doing a little net searching, I'm going to say those are Virago forks... maybe off an 1100 version...Leave a comment:
-
Notice that I specified without either a fender or fork brace, that the combo of the reduced trail (I've read fredintoon's description of the swap to standard trees with special forks enough to remember which way the hack guys go) AND no bracing of the forks as being dangerous. And the primary problem to me is the lack of any bracing. So, I spoke specifically of the COMBO of the two, and feel, fix either one and you only have a bit of a twitchy bike, rather than potential hazard, but I have PERSONALLY had the forks on mine start with the twisting because of things not being just right, and it gets scary, I could imagine it with less trail AND nothing to brace the two fork tubes together.I would like to INVITE you to do the Special/Standard TT swap and ride it yourself to feel the real difference it provides. I'll bet that Fredintoon has ridden his TT swapped bike unhacked, and didn't have any tendency to inadvertently steer off the road!
Okay, I'll stop ranting...just had to provide my...I hate to use the term....
real world experience in a drasticly reduced trail, and can't expect the TT swap to provide anywhere near how my bike handles, and it still does handle quite well.
T.C.Leave a comment:
-
The question here TC is if those are XJ forks, how would the smaller diameter rotors work?
The pads would only be catching on roughly 1/2 of the face. Those calipers look comfortable on those small rotors.
Possibly the whole front end, tripple trees and all were swapped.Leave a comment:
-
Jeez, we got TC fired up...

TC, reduced trail is bad for several reasons, but it doesn't automatically mean you're going to crash and die. I've ridden bikes with too-low trail and some seemed fine, and a few were scary...
The big problem IMHO is with low trail is the bike is more easily 'upset' and under the 'wrong' circumstances can develop a nasty tank-slapper without much warning, particularly for the unaware. Large bumps in corners, transitions across RR tracks, things that may give you pause even when cornering with a 'good' trail number are the usual culprits. The over-length tubes installed on yours helped bring back some trail by effectively increasing your neck rake. But I knew a couple of guys who had 'underwear changing' experiences with low trail, and at least one guy who got hurt. An experienced rider will have a better shot at maintaining control, but somebody with less skill may not be so lucky.
Leave a comment:
-
Okay, the forks do Not look exactly like an xs11's, they do have the leading axle special style, but the calipers are NOT the single bolt swivel ones that the True Specials have, they have 2 mounting bolts and a different kind of bracket at the back side of the fork tubes. Again, they weren't blacked out, so I still don't think they were MNS, but probably just regular XJ's, otherwise, they shouldn't/wouldn't fit into the TT's if they were 2 mm's smaller diameter than the XS/Xj's? The wheel diameter size looks right though, the 19 is not much larger than the 17 of the standard...see the OEM photo.
T.C.Leave a comment:
-
The forks are 80-81 specials, but the TT's appear to be Standards, possibly left over from the frame and a PO front ender damaging the forks?? They are/were not MNS since they were NOT blacked out in the original photos. The swirly wheel is XJ most likely.
Now I have a strong DISagreement with both Cy and Steve regarding the "twitchyness" of his steering with the forks/TT combo. One of these days, I'll take the basket case Special I have, and the Standard I have, and measure/verify the ~6" of trail for both in OEM config, and then find out how much reduction of Trail occurs with the TT swap..but if I remember it correctly, I thought it was that the Sidecar folks would put Special TT's on their Standard bikes/frames/forks....not the other way around.
The Special TT's have the fork tubes positioned closer front to back with the steering axle/shaft....the Standard positions the fork tubes farther away/apart from the steering shaft...so the end result of the different positions of the wheel axles being on the ends vs. leading ends up with the same Trail affect.
I'm sure someone with much better math/geometry/?Calc? skills could measure the distance between the steering shaft and fork tubes on both TT's, and calculate the real Trail amount without having to do a bunch of actual parts swapping and then line/laser marking/measuring!?
My bike suffered a severe front ender event shortly after I got it back to the States from Japan...ended up putting on 4" overlength upper fork tubes during the Dealership repair process....always like the slight "chopper" look, and mine was a special! Unbeknownst to me and possibly also the dealership, but the neck on the frame got bent PERFECTLY inwards towards the engine, but the EASIER steering was attributed to the longer forks? This didn't seem right to me..from my little experience with putting on longer forks on my BICYCLES...the steering seemed much tougher/harder.
But I like the easier steering, and just got used to it. 10-12 years later at a rally, a bike mechanic rode my bike, and then inspected and found the BENT frame neck section. Suggested I swapped frames to get an OEM frame.
Now, MY trail has been reduced(I've actually measured it) from the OEM 6" down to about 2.5" !
Yes...2 and 1/2", so I will admit that this is an EXTREME reduction in trail and does make the bike a "little" twitchy only in that it likes to OVERSTEER a little in the twisties, but I can run the twisties fairly well, just ask MartyA, Mr66, Bruce Gerkin, etc.!
Also, at the last Spring XS rally this year Rman got to ride my bike, and he had no troubles handling it, commented on the EASE of steering, but not that it felt like it wanted to steer into a tree if you weren't white nuckleing it!!!
SO...with the slight change in position that the Standard to Special TT swap would provide, I can't see it making it anywhere near the description of "Twitchy" that you guys are throwing around. I've ridden some OEM bikes at the rallies, and was surprised at the HEAVYNESS of the steering!
I would like to INVITE you to do the Special/Standard TT swap and ride it yourself to feel the real difference it provides. I'll bet that Fredintoon has ridden his TT swapped bike unhacked, and didn't have any tendency to inadvertently steer off the road!
Okay, I'll stop ranting...just had to provide my...I hate to use the term....
real world experience in a drasticly reduced trail, and can't expect the TT swap to provide anywhere near how my bike handles, and it still does handle quite well.
T.C.Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: